12/09/2025 / By Cassie B.

The true cost of America’s contaminated water is now being measured in billions of dollars and the fragile lives of newborns. A groundbreaking study has put a staggering price tag on the public health disaster caused by “forever chemicals” lurking in drinking water, revealing an economic burden of at least $8 billion every year. This research, led by economists and scientists at the University of Arizona and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, provides some of the firmest evidence yet that real-world exposure to these toxic compounds is devastating infant health and imposing massive long-term costs on society.
The team analyzed every birth in New Hampshire over a decade, from 2010 to 2019, focusing on mothers who drew their water from wells. By comparing mothers whose wells were downstream from known PFAS contamination sites to those with upstream wells, they isolated the chemical’s harrowing effects. The results were heartbreaking.
Mothers with contaminated water experienced dramatically worse outcomes. They faced higher first-year infant mortality, more dangerously preterm births, and a greater number of low birth weight babies. These are not minor statistical blips but profound tragedies for families, now directly linked to environmental poisoning.
The economists then translated these health impacts into a national economic cost. The $8 billion annual figure encompasses immediate medical care, long-term health consequences for the children, and their reduced lifetime earnings. Study co-author Derek Lemoine, a professor of economics, framed the choice with clarity. “If we compare costs we’re finding versus the cost of cleaning up PFAS, the answers are obvious,” Lemoine said. “Removing PFAS from drinking water not only results in drastically improved health outcomes. It also produces a significant long-term economic benefit.”
This study zeroed in on two notorious forever chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, which are no longer manufactured in the U.S. but persist relentlessly in the environment. Their legacy is a ticking time bomb in the soil. “Whatever PFAS we see in groundwater is only a tiny fraction of the PFAS that has been dumped in the environment,” said associate professor of hydrology Bo Guo, a study co-author. “The majority of PFAS is still in the soil and migrating downward.”
The University of Arizona findings add immense weight to years of warnings from public health advocates. The Environmental Working Group has long argued that PFAS exposure suppresses the immune system and increases risks of cancer and developmental harm. Their own research suggests that more than 200 million Americans could have PFAS in their drinking water. Independent scientists recommend a safe level at 1 part per trillion, a standard far stricter than the EPA’s outdated health advisory.
The new economic data exposes the folly of regulatory delay. For decades, industrial polluters have discharged these chemicals, creating a nationwide contamination crisis affecting thousands of locations. The $8 billion dollar annual loss reveals the crushing price of failing to protect people.
There is a practical, immediate step individuals can take, however. The study authors note that activated carbon filters can remove these long-chain PFAS. “These chemicals may be everywhere, but we still find that drinking water matters for pregnant women,” Lemoine said. “Installing and maintaining home water filters could be prudent for them.”
Ultimately, this research shifts the conversation from scientific concern to urgent economic and moral imperative. The health of the next generation is being compromised before birth, and the bill for that damage is now due. Every year of inaction on PFAS cleanup and regulation doesn’t just risk lives; it actively steals billions from the nation’s future, proving that the true cost of pollution is always paid, one way or another.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
chemicals, clean water, contaminated water, drinking water, environ, forever chemicals, PFAS, toxins, water filter
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 ENVIRON NEWS
